\

May 2025

What the Final I-35 Cap and Stitch Plan Means for Downtown and East Austin

Well, I think its finally over. We have a plan for what is going to happen with the new I-35. There has been a debate for years over what the new I-35 would look like – especially through downtown Austin. I have written about it multiple times in this blog. And now, it appears that debate is finally over. And while its not the plan I would choose – moving I-35 to 130 and making the current I-35 a boulevard – at least there will be some caps through downtown. So lets talk about what the City Council Approved.

The Austin City Council’s I-35 Plan

On May 22, 2025, the Austin City Council approved a “Cap and Stitch” plan for the new I-35. The plan will cost approximately $105 million and will hopefully help reconnect downtown Austin with East Austin by constructing highway deck plazas over Interstate 35 (I-35).

The Cap and Stitch project involves building “caps,” or deck plazas, over sunken sections of I-35, creating new public spaces such as parks, trails, and community areas. Additionally, “stitches” refer to widened east-west crossings designed to enhance pedestrian and cyclist connectivity across the highway. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is currently undertaking the $4.5 billion Capital Express Central Project to expand and lower I-35, providing an opportunity for the city to implement these caps and stitches concurrently.

The Path to Approval: Debates and Deliberations

The journey to the May 22 approval was long and treacherous. For a long time, I wasn’t sure if we were ever going to reach an agreement.

When TxDot first announced the I-35 plan, there were a lot of competing ideas for how it should look through Austin. As I wrote above (and in the past), I have always supported the plan to move I-35 to 130 and make downtown a boulevard. But I knew that was unlikely to happen – even though it makes the most sense.

Instead, I also previously wrote that we should cap it all and make a giant park – much like Clive Warren Park in Dallas. Well all the competing ideas lead to a lot of debate over what to do.

It has always seemed like a lot of people supported some kind of cap over the downtown area. But the question was always who would pay for it and how much of a cap. Initially, the comprehensive Cap and Stitch plan was estimated to cost over $1.4 billion, raising concerns about the city’s financial capacity to support such an ambitious project. Compounding these concerns was the uncertainty surrounding a previously awarded $105 million federal grant, which was placed under review due to federal budgetary constraints .

Council members were divided on the scope and funding of the project. Some advocated for a scaled-down version focusing on essential roadway elements to support future caps, while others emphasized the long-term benefits of a more comprehensive approach. Council Member Mike Siegel expressed reservations about the project’s cost, suggesting that funds might be better allocated to immediate needs such as affordable housing and climate initiatives.

In contrast, Council Members José “Chito” Vela and Zo Qadri highlighted the project’s potential to rectify historical injustices and promote community unity. They argued that investing in the Cap and Stitch plan would create lasting public spaces and opportunities for economic development, drawing inspiration from successful projects like Dallas’ Klyde Warren Park .

Details of the Approved Plan

The final approved plan is a compromise of the different council positions. The $104 million investment focuses on constructing the foundational roadway elements necessary for future caps and stitches. Specifically, the plan includes:

  • Caps between Cesar Chavez and Fourth Streets, Fourth and Seventh Streets, and 11th and 12th Streets.
  • Two 300-foot stitches to enhance pedestrian and cyclist crossings between 41st Street and the Red Line in North Austin

While this funding does not cover the construction of the caps themselves, it ensures that the necessary structural components are integrated into TxDOT’s ongoing I-35 project, preserving the opportunity to develop the caps in the future.

Looking Ahead

Look, the final plan isn’t the ideal that I would have hoped for. But this is politics. We almost never get the ideal. So we have to settle for the potentially good. And the approval of the Cap and Stitch plan represents a significant milestone in Austin’s efforts to address historical divisions and promote equitable urban development. By investing in the foundational elements now, the city positions itself to create transformative public spaces that will benefit future generations.

What the Final I-35 Cap and Stitch Plan Means for Downtown and East Austin Read More »

Starbase and the Return of the Company Town

If you are a long-term read reader of this blog – first, I’m sorry – but second then you’ll know I’ve written previously about the return of the company town. Its something that interests me as a one more weapon in the fight for affordability.

Well, we have the next entrant into the return of the company town world. On May 3, 2025, Elon Musk’s vision of creating a city dedicated to space exploration materialized as residents of Boca Chica, Texas, voted overwhelmingly to incorporate their community into the new city of Starbase. So let’s talk about it.

 

What is Starbase?

Located at the southern tip of Texas near Brownsville, Starbase is the newly incorporated city that primarily serves SpaceX’s space exploration efforts. The push to incorporate Starbase as an official city began in earnest in March 2021, when Musk announced his intentions to create a city centered around SpaceX’s operations. After years of development and community engagement, the proposal culminated in a vote where 212 out of 218 participants supported the incorporation. The newly formed city spans approximately 1.5 square miles and is home to just over 500 residents, most of whom are SpaceX employees and their families.

The establishment of Starbase required close collaboration with local and state government entities. In December 2024, SpaceX submitted a petition to Cameron County officials to hold an election on the incorporation of the city. Following the successful vote, the city awaits formal recognition through a judicial order.

As an incorporated city, Starbase will have the authority to manage its infrastructure, including roads, utilities, and emergency services. SpaceX has already invested in community development projects, such as a planned $22 million, 20,000-square-foot community center set to begin construction in June 2025.

 

The Return of the Company Town?

While the notion of a city built around a single employer may seem novel today, it echoes a familiar pattern from the early 20th century when industrial giants like Pullman and Hershey constructed company towns to house their workers.

Company towns in the early 1900s were designed to keep workers close to their place of employment while also controlling their living conditions and social environment. Pullman, Illinois, established by the Pullman Company in the late 19th century, is a classic example. The company provided housing, stores, and recreational facilities, but workers were dependent on their employer for every aspect of life.

Similarly, Starbase seems to exist primarily to serve the needs of SpaceX and its employees. The city’s infrastructure, housing, and planned amenities—like the $22 million community center—are closely tied to the company. However, unlike early company towns, Starbase is emerging in a modern legal and social framework that theoretically provides greater autonomy to its residents.

While early company towns were often criticized for exploitative practices, modern society may limit that. Things like a more mobile workforce, improved labor laws, and public scrutiny are likely to benefit SpaceX employees who live in Starbase.

 

The Benefits of a Modern Company Town

Obviously one of the key advantages of living in Starbase is the convenience it offers employees. That’s probably the biggest driving force behind a company town. Here, living near SpaceX’s facilities reduces commuting time, allowing workers to dedicate more time to their projects or family life. This is particularly beneficial if the rumors of the long hours demanded by Musk are true.

Additionally, the integration of work and home can foster a strong sense of community. Residents share a collective purpose, which can enhance social cohesion. This is similar to the camaraderie seen in early company towns, where workers often formed tight-knit communities centered around their jobs.

Furthermore, housing tied to employment could potentially be more affordable than in larger urban areas, especially in Texas, where property costs are lower than in tech hubs like Silicon Valley. If SpaceX ensures subsidized or reasonably priced housing, Starbase could mitigate some of the affordability crises faced by workers in other tech industries.

 

But Its not All Wine and Roses

However, the model also has significant downsides, most notably the challenge of job mobility. When housing is tied to employment, leaving the job means leaving the community and home. This dependency can discourage workers from seeking new opportunities, potentially stifling career growth.

In the early 1900s, company towns often left workers financially trapped, unable to afford to leave due to high rents and the lack of other job prospects in the area. While Starbase does not directly replicate these conditions, the reliance on SpaceX for housing and amenities could lead to a similar form of dependency, particularly if the local economy remains dominated by a single employer.

Furthermore, company control over essential services can also create conflicts of interest. In past company towns, decisions about community welfare were often influenced by corporate priorities rather than residents’ needs. As Starbase grows, ensuring a balance between SpaceX’s interests and the community’s well-being will be critical.

 

Its an Interesting Innovation

The revival of the company town model through Starbase (and others) presents both opportunities and challenges. The convenience of living close to work and the potential for affordable housing are undoubtedly appealing. However, the risk of economic dependency and limited job mobility cannot be ignored.

I look forward to seeing how Starbase evolves and turns out, as well as whether it inspires other companies to do something similar. It is certainly an interesting experiment to watch.

Starbase and the Return of the Company Town Read More »